Bad Teaching: Women Rule, Men Drool, part 3

 

bad teachingThis is the last of a three-part series; here are the links to part 1 and part 2.

 

In my first post in this series, I presented the possibility (probability?) of a wide-spread acceptance in the Christian church of the idea that women are more godly, holy and spiritual than men, and included quotes from others who said that they have bumped up against the idea. I posited that this assumption might be a reason for the disconnect between men and the Church, and presented findings from a Pew Research study showing that, of all the world’s religions, Christianity is the only one with a greater female membership.

My second post explored material that showed that the presumption of a female-superiority teaching is actually quite possible and that there is a very good likelihood that this teaching is at the root of much of the dysfunction that troubles today’s church.

Beatings Will Continue Until Morale Improves

In my posts on LYWACLTC™, I showed how what should be sound biblical teaching has been re-worked into a cudgel that is used to beat men into submission to their marriages. On a greater scale, the Church seems to be agreeing with society that masculinity is the gender equivalent of Mos Eisley, a “hive of scum and villainy.” Of course, this would go a long way toward explaining why Christianity is the only major religion that doesn’t appeal to men.

And yet, ironically, one of the most common complaints that wives make to pastors, speakers, writers and broadcasters about their husbands? “My husband isn’t being the spiritual leader in our home that he needs to be.” Please, someone, show me the logic in telling the poor sod that he’s a spiritual inferior and then turn around and demand that he be his wife’s Billy Graham? Talk about setting someone up for failure.

There is a C. S. Lewis quote from his book The Abolition of Man that describes this situation perfectly. While not addressing any inferiority doctrine, he writes about how society is creating the kind of man it doesn’t want:

We make men without chests and expect of them virtue and enterprise. We laugh at honor and are shocked to find traitors in our midst. We castrate and bid the geldings be fruitful.

He’s only right. The Church effectively castrates the Christian man and castigates him for not being as spiritual as his wife, and then expects him to come up to snuff; religiously approved snuff, that is. (After all, we don’t want the geldings to get to feeling their oats.)

From Macroview To Microview

Parts 1 & 2 delved into the state of the Church with regard to the acceptance of the idea of female superiority. While I will concede the possibility that my marshaling of examples might not be a complete juggernaut of logic, I do think that I’ve presented a case that merits further consideration of this idea as a problem.

Being a guy, though, means that theoretical discussions can become frustrating, and I start wondering when we are going to get around to fixing something. In this case, I’d like to leave the abstract and look at the problem of this bad teaching in concrete terms. And being a person who believes that one’s faith should be put into action, I am given to wondering…

How Does This Play Out In The Sticks?

I get that Eggerichs, Paul Byerly, Paul Coughlin, et. al., have had discussions that let them know that the Feminine Superiority teaching exists, but I begin to wonder how this plays out in a marriage. I get that we can talk about this supposed teaching in the abstract, but what happens when this occurs in the raw, in the face to face interaction of a real marriage? How can this teaching be maintained?

By Practicality:
It works. As long as the husband buys into the teaching that he is sinful, it does what it is supposed to. One man I know tells of being in a spiritually abusive church for ten years that taught husbands that they were lower than pond scum and that they needed to heed their wives. The wives loved it and the men were docile enough to submit. He said, “The upshot of this false teaching, and the constant hammering on the congregation’s men, resulted in a lot of men handing over authority of the family to the wives—all because we were told how bad men were, and how spiritually immature.”

As long as the husband buys into it, it works for both. But should he “fall from grace”, or the scales drop from his eyes, he’s in for a fight, because attempting to reclaim ceded authority is met…

By Pride:
Pure spiritual pride. George Bernard Shaw, another great quote machine, is supposed to have said, “Any government that robs Peter to pay Paul can count on the support of Paul.” I’m pretty sure the same dynamic occurs in churches, as well. When the preacher strokes your fur the right way, it feels g-o-o-o-o-d!

And you just know that the preacher is a discerning and perspicacious leader when he tells you just how marvelous you are, that you are a fine asset to the kingdom. And you get to jump to the head of the line in your marriage when the church tells you that you are the fair-haired child. Yeah, pride.

When you think about it, though, doesn’t the whole inconsistency of the situation just floor you? Basically, it’s a complete contradiction, right? After all, someone who is spiritual knows that pride is a sin, that Christians are enjoined to humility, right? I’m pretty sure that this inconsistency isn’t lost on the proud, but I think that there is a reason to continue to desperately hold onto this facade of pride. Any attempt to get at the reality will be met…

By Panic:
Pure fear of exposure. This last one I didn’t tumble to on my own. Last year, I came across one of Sheila Wray Gregoire’s older books, honey, i don’t have a headache tonight, and in the second chapter, I read a paragraph that surprised me, but yet connected with statements I have seen many times over: a wife’s insecurity and low-esteem, a common malady. Gregoire wrote:

Women tend to want to be seen as the “good ones” in the marriage. We usually feel far more vulnerable in relationships than men do,… If we admit to being wrong, we give our husbands a reason to leave. So instead we have to prove that they are the ones who need to improve so they understand what a good deal they’ve got. Why would someone with as many faults as he has leave a relationship? Who else is going to take someone so messed up? We have a vested interest in preserving the status quo, where he is seen as the one who is too demanding, too insensitive, and too unromantic.
~ my emphasis

I think this last, fear of exposure, makes spiritual superiority the security blanket that must be clutched, the last fig leaf to be allowed to hide behind. Holding to a doctrine of spiritual superiority confers an aura of rectitude that is darn near unassailable. If you read different writers and bloggers, you won’t have long to wait before you come across posts and articles about wifely anxiety and esteem problems, and encouragement for these wives to trust that their husbands actually do love and care for them.

Practicality, Pride, Panic ~ Meet Jesus

In my third post on the Church and Porn, I gave my solution for dealing with pornography in our society:

We can do what the church is supposed to do: present the Truth and stand firm in that Truth. When the Church has preached Christ and lived out the truth of the Gospel, then they have affected society and changed the culture around them.

Stand firm in the truth.

I realize that this isn’t a whiz-bang, grab-your-attention solution, but it’s how the Church has changed society down through the ages. Truth triumphs. And for a marriage in which the doctrine of Wifely Superiority has taken root, standing in the truth seems to me to be the only solution. Arguing and fighting over who is “better” is a guaranteed loser from the get-go, and continued compliance is also unacceptable. I know that it would be sexier if I could come up with a five-point plan, with diagrams and dialogs, for changing such a marriage; something like that I could probably turn into an ebook. But, no; as a Christian man/husband, simply stand in the truth of the Word of God.

Here is the truth for both husband and wife. Yes, you are a sinner saved by grace. So is your wife. As such, we are children of the King. But here’s the catch: you also have foibles, faults and failings. And so does your wife. Yes, it is wonderful, even glorious, to be saved, but if you can’t even cop to needing to be saved from your sins, then why do you need a Savior?

In C. S. Lewis’s Prince Caspian, Aslan tells the title character, “You come from the Lord Adam and the Lady Eve. And that is both honour enough to erect the head of the poorest beggar, and shame enough to bow the shoulders of the greatest emperor on earth; Be content.”

CSL

If any of my readers are dealing with this specific problem, I want to offer these suggested resources as tools for dealing with Wifely Spiritual Superiority:

Love & Respect by Emerson Eggerichs – Excellent book for learning The Crazy Cycle and how to get off of it.
Boundaries by Cloud and Townsend – If you are dealing with sanctimony in your marriage, this book will help you in learning to define acceptable guidelines on attitudes and actions.
My blog post articles on what Loving Your Wife As Christ Loved The Church really means, and how to recognize the manipulation of false LYWACLTC™ teaching.

7 Comments

Filed under Culture, Marriage & Sexuality, Theology Stuff

Bad Teaching: Women Rule, Men Drool, part 2

bad teaching

This is the second of a three-part series: here are the links to part 1 and part 3.

In my last post I presented the idea that, contrary to the teachings of the Bible, today’s church had somehow gotten hold of the idea that women were superior to men and without sin. I admit that it is a novel idea to articulate, but since it seems that this is held as truth by more than a few Christians (however tacitly), this seems like a good time to bring the teaching out into the light of day and examine it.

I cited several writers who have suggested that they have come across the concept in their interactions but didn’t give any particulars or examples, other than to comment that they have observed evidence that it is held by some Christians. While it might be difficult to find a teacher or preacher who openly avows support for such a belief, I did cite a study by the Pew Research group that might demonstrate the results of such a teaching being promulgated. In that first post, I included the Pew Research chart that showed that in all branches of Christianity (save the Orthodox branch) women outnumber men as adherents. The chart further showed that every other major religion has more male adherents than women, leaving Christianity as… Continue reading

7 Comments

Filed under Culture, Marriage & Sexuality, Theology Stuff

Bad Teaching: Women Rule, Men Drool, part 1

bad teaching

This is the first of a three-part series: here are the links to part 2 and part 3.

We have a problem in the church. It appears that nearly one-half of the church is made up of carnal, fleshly-minded people whose only thoughts are with satisfying their appetites, and have no desire nor ability to truly seek after God. They hide behind a facade of Christianity but, in fact, are incapable of self-control and are unable to submit to the direction of the Holy Spirit and pursue spiritual goals.

I can only be speaking, of course, about husbands, for it is well-known that wives are more spiritual, more holy and more godly than any ordinary man could possibly be. I know, I know; in the past, I’ve said that there are two sinners in every marriage, but today, I repent of such drollery. I have seen the error of my ways. Continue reading

6 Comments

Filed under Culture, Marriage & Sexuality, Theology Stuff

The Church and Porn, part 3

porn3

This is the last of a three-part series: here are the links to part 1 and part 2.

Okay, to summarize my two previous posts: Paul Byerly, of Generous Husband, started a discussion among CMBA bloggers about pornography and the efficacy of the Church’s response. This is something I’ve been thinking about, and so did my first post on making the main thing the main thing, and not wandering off on crusades. My second post was a brief (for me, anyway) look at some examples of how Christians have affected society in the past.

Today, I want to try to tie those two posts together in a suggestion/rant (take your pick.) Continue reading

13 Comments

Filed under Christian Beliefs, Marriage & Sexuality

A Quick PSA

I don’t normally tell my readers about something that is for sale, but this calls for an exception. However, I just received notice in my inbox that an excellent marriage resource is available at a bargain price.

All too often, one of the partners in a marriage is occupying the place of a doormat for the other. Unable to say “No” and desiring to be “a witness for Christ,” they carry the burdens of the marriage in an unequal relationship. One of my recommendations for new readers is to join The Marriage Bed forum (see sidebar for link); one of the most recommended books on TMB is Boundaries, by Cloud and Townsend. It tells how to set proper boundaries in marriage in order to restore normalcy to relationships.

If you use either a Kindle reader or iBooks on an Apple device, the book is available from just $2.99. I am buying it for my iPad and I highly recommend readers get it, as well. 

One final note, I do not have any affiliate programs going, so this isn’t something that I do for support. (This post will stay up as long as the book is on sale.)

CSL

3 Comments

Filed under Marriage & Sexuality

The Church and Porn, part 2

porn2

This is the last of a three-part series: here are the links to part 1 and part 3.

Members of the Christian Marriage Bloggers Assn. are in the process of discussing the damaging effects of porn on marriage, and how the Church is responding to it. I have been thinking about the issue of porn and the Church’s response, and I’ve come to the conclusion that much of our response, while not necessarily ill-advised, is merely ineffective. In my previous post, I presented the idea that when we choose to come against a sin, we do two things: we approach the fight in our own strength and not in God’s spirit, and we change our identity from Christians to Crusaders.

My thought is that we need to “make the main thing the main thing” by downplaying what we are “agin” and emphasizing the evangelism of our society. In essence, as some might deride it, return to that old time religion. It’s worked in the past, so why do you think that mankind is too sophisticated for God’s good news? Continue reading

2 Comments

Filed under Marriage & Sexuality

The Church and Porn, part 1

porn1

This is the last of a three-part series: here are the links to part 2 and part 3.

This is going to be another departure from what I usually try to address on my blog, but I want to respond to something that Paul Byerly asked of the members of the Christian Marriage Bloggers Assn. Without giving the text, I will say that Paul B. wrote of his concern about the damage that pornography is doing to marriages in our country, and asked if the Church’s message and approach in responding to porn should be changed. Continue reading

4 Comments

Filed under Marriage & Sexuality

“It’s Y’ALL’S Sex Life”

Just a quick-hitter this week.

If you’ve read much of my blog, you will have come across the above title any number of times; it’s become one of my mantras. Just a few minutes ago, I read an article that came out last week from the Chicago Tribune, telling of a survey done by the Pew Research Center.

The take-away from the Pew study was supposed to be that shared chores was that the key to a happy marriage. The survey of 35,000 adults showed that 56% of the respondents said that “shared chores” were very important to a happy marriage. In fact, that was the headline of the Pew Center’s article. Continue reading

5 Comments

Filed under Marriage & Sexuality

Twain on Relationships, part 4

eve4

Here are the links to Part One, Part Two and Part Three.

This is my last post on Mark Twain’s Diaries of Adam and Eve, and while Eve’s observation about how it is preferable to be alone rather than unwanted was an eye-opener (Diary post #3), I love the way that Twain developed his two characters, and gives insight into masculine and feminine psyches. Yes, your cuddly Curmudgeon is a throw-back, and for that I make no apologies, so if someone wants to take me to task for not being grounded in the 21st century — oh well, and shuckydarn. Continue reading

6 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

Twain on Relationships, part 3

eve3

Here are the links to Part OnePart Two, and Part Four.

In re-reading Mark Twain’s Diary of Adam and Eve, I was quite surprised to discover, in addition to more proof that Twain is the wonderful humorist that we all know him to be, but to also find that he had keen insight into the human heart. All too often, people can be funny but at the expense of others. In my mind, empathy for one’s subjects is what separates a true humorist from run-of-the-mill hacks.

When creating his characters for the Diaries, Twain decided to portray Adam as an aloof “guy”, happy to be left alone in the Garden, but willing to put up with the foolishness of the other “creature”; you know, live and let live. Yes, he feels put upon by many of her ways, but she is living in the Garden, too, so, well, there you are. Continue reading

6 Comments

Filed under Marriage & Sexuality